Assemble a small panel with complementary obsessions: one language nerd, one material culture buff, one pacing hawk. Give them checklists for continuity, anachronisms, and sensory gaps. Reward with gratitude and transparency. When they disagree, diagnose the root need rather than counting votes. Post your current checklist template and invite the community to add one question each that would sharpen your next pass without smothering your characters’ warmth or momentum.
Consider small notes that neither brag nor apologize. A graceful afterword can credit sources, confess a deliberate change, and point curious readers toward exhibitions or documentaries. Transparency builds trust and invites learning. Use sparing footnotes where tone allows, or host an annotated map online. Share a draft of your acknowledgments or resource page, and ask readers what would make them feel respected, curious, and eager to discuss your choices without derailing immersion.
Create soft indicators that track believability: how often readers ask for maps, when they quote in-world jokes, whether they can predict prices or calendar beats. If they guess correctly, your rules communicate. If not, adjust. Measure emotional testimony too: did someone miss your village after closing the book? Post two metrics you’ll monitor during revision, and welcome suggestions that anchor your judgment in reader behavior rather than the comfort of your drafting habits.